Aug-2025
Sales
Trend
6-Month
Product Count
SKUs
Overview
Market Insights Snapshot
In Arizona, Grow Sciences has shown a varied performance across different cannabis categories. In the Concentrates category, the brand maintained a steady position, oscillating between the 6th and 7th ranks from May to August 2025. This stability indicates a consistent consumer demand, despite a noticeable dip in sales from May to June. Meanwhile, in the Edible category, Grow Sciences has demonstrated an upward trajectory, moving from rank 25 in May to 18 in August, highlighting a growing preference for their edible products. The Flower category has seen a remarkable leap in August, jumping to the 15th position from the 26th in July, which could suggest a successful marketing strategy or product launch. However, in the Pre-Roll segment, the brand has struggled to break into the top 30, consistently ranking just outside, which might indicate a need for strategic adjustments in this category.
In contrast, the performance of Grow Sciences in Illinois reflects challenges in establishing a strong foothold. The Flower category saw a decline in rank from 63 in June to 69 in August, which might suggest increased competition or a shift in consumer preferences. Similarly, the Vapor Pens category did not make it to the top 30 in May and August, indicating potential areas for growth or reevaluation of their product offerings. On a brighter note, the Pre-Roll category saw a brief improvement, achieving a rank of 29 in July before dropping again, which could imply that certain promotions or product features resonated with consumers temporarily. Overall, the data suggests that while Grow Sciences is making strides in some areas, it faces significant competition and challenges in others, particularly in the Illinois market.
Competitive Landscape
In the competitive landscape of the Arizona vapor pens market, Grow Sciences has shown a steady improvement in its rankings from May to August 2025, moving up from 17th to 12th place. This upward trend is indicative of a positive trajectory in sales performance, as evidenced by a consistent increase in sales figures over the same period. In contrast, iLava maintained a stable position at 10th place but experienced a decline in sales, suggesting a potential vulnerability in maintaining its rank. Meanwhile, Mohave Cannabis Co. has shown significant growth, climbing from 18th to 11th place, which could pose a competitive threat to Grow Sciences if the trend continues. IO Extracts and Session Premium Cannabis (AZ) have experienced fluctuations in their rankings, with IO Extracts dropping slightly and Session Premium Cannabis (AZ) falling from 11th to 14th place, suggesting potential challenges in sustaining their market positions. These dynamics highlight the competitive pressure within the Arizona vapor pens market, emphasizing the importance for Grow Sciences to capitalize on its current momentum to further enhance its market share.
Notable Products
In August 2025, the top-performing product for Grow Sciences was the Strawberry Tangerine Rosin Fruit Chews 10-Pack (100mg) in the Edible category, which ascended to the number one rank with sales figures reaching 2303 units. The Florida Jack Pre-Roll (1g) saw a slight drop from the top position in previous months to rank second, with sales of 2193 units. Prickly Pear (3.7g) in the Flower category improved its standing, moving up to third place from fifth in July 2025. Pink Grapefruit Rosin Chews 10-Pack (100mg) maintained a consistent presence in the top rankings, securing fourth place. The Florida Jack Live Resin Cartridge (0.5g) entered the top five for the first time, ranking fifth in August 2025.
Top Selling Cannabis Brands
Data for this report comes from real-time sales reporting by participating cannabis retailers via their point-of-sale systems, which are linked up with Headset’s business intelligence software. Headset’s data is very reliable, as it comes digitally direct from our partner retailers. However, the potential does exist for misreporting in the instance of duplicates, incorrectly classified products, inaccurate entry of products into point-of-sale systems, or even simple human error at the point of purchase. Thus, there is a slight margin of error to consider. Brands listed on this page are ranked in the top twenty within the market and product category by total retail sales volume.